On almost every news show I watched last week on different channels, the new airport security system was brought up. I think this is a pretty interesting topic because it brought up so much controversy and I really don’t know which side I am on.
One part of me likes the idea of how uptight the security is because in a small way it makes you feel safer. But another part of me is uncomfortable with the whole idea.
This article demonstrates that there are concerns that this new machine can lead to cancer risks
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/300735
If you chose to opt out of going through the machine you have to have a pat down. However this also brings up further complications because apparently the pat down is so embarrassing its like they are bullying you into doing the body scanner.
There are also problems concerning cancer patients. On gawker.com there were two stories posted about this particular situation:
“Bladder cancer survivor Thomas Sawyer, whose pat-down ended with himself soaked in his own urine, after the TSA agent broke the seal on his urostomy bag, which was filled with his own urine. According to Sawyer, “They never apologized. They never offered to help. They acted like they hadn’t seen what happened. But I know they saw it because I had a wet mark.” He wasn’t able to clean himself until after boarding his flight.
Flight attendant Cathy Bossi, a breast cancer survivor who was forced to remove her prosthetic breast during an “aggressive” pat down, even though TSA agents “aren’t supposed to remove any prosthetics” (they do have the right to see prosthetics).”
I don’t know if all the controversy will change any of these regulations or if the airport security will only continue to be intensified.